I can't figure out what the goals is. Is it to deaded the room somewhat and make the sound more neutral or insulate the room from the rest of the house or maybe the neighbors? :geek:
We'll have to see about that one. SLC is always good and should allow the smaller sizes to perform as well as the larger ones. I expect the price to be at least double the C300 per GB.
Thanks. Maybe it has always been like that. I configured the CP to show signatures but remove Avataters. I am usually not logged in when viewing, only when posting. Of course I do log in about 15 times a day. ;)
Hmm. It looks like they use Nikon 5000ED and 9000ED and Epson 4490 scanners. I owned two each of the Nikon 4000ED and 8000ED scanners, which were the slightly older respective models. None of them are really commercial volume scanners.
I don't know why the output would be 3000 DPI unless...
That is how we always did in the olden days. The speaker/enclosures are designed by the manufacturer to be decoupled from the environment unless it a custom (rather expensive) design. In that case you might want input from a professional engineer. ;)
IS 3000 DPI sufficient for your needs? If the negs are 1980s era or earlier probably so, but by the 1990s the 100 ISO negative films had better resolution. Of course Kodachromes and most slow chromes since the 1990s have more detail than 3000DPI can show. At those prices I guess it does not...
Unfortunately many of the newer photographers don’t learn the basics of lighting. A semester of that would be a really good idea before starting in with macros, which are often at least as challenging.
I've used a multitude of ring rings and twin lights from the 1960s explosion-loud...
I have no recent experience with digital services. What are you doing with the output. Maybe you can find an inexpensive, used scanner and do it yourself? :cheese:
It's all cheap crap. You just happen to have a bad one. Maybe I was lucky with the Thermaltake Duet.
Now I'm really liking USB 3.0. There is not the drama of eSATA and cables are up to 15 feet. :)
I obtained one of those fans and it works fine. The speed control is nice, but it would be better with an off position. Are there any drivers for the fan? I did not see any online.
I also doubt that makes any difference. Does the laptop support the higher speeds?
Photoshop would be one reason to have 8GB, but then the user should be looking at Macs, too.
Which controller card do you have? The Thermaltake toasters are quite good, perhaps not as cheesy as other kinds. I prefer the ones with slots for two drives to be used simultaneously. I also like the USB 3 SIIG toaster which has a small internal fan to reduce drive temperature.
Something like this. I bought a couple for $20 a few years ago, but they are getting weak. Prices are high now. Ideally there should be a similar device that uses replaceable 18650 cells.
Useful DOF is limited by physics. There are numerous calculators out there or create an Excel template. Below around f/8 diffraction limits per pixel resolution of the 7D. Smaller apertures may be acceptable depending on final magnification, i.e. print size and viewing distance. DOF can be...
Windows Explorer really turned me off the one time I installed 7. The line spacing in the detail view was very high, so the number of files viewable at once was reduced. There was also a whole row of wasted space in the toolbars at the top.
It is not surprising. Prices will continue to fall and that is an old model. The higher price of a SandStorm drive is really worth it. The old Vortex is fine for booting and reads, but bogs down with heavy writes. Sometimes it stutters on my page file. :cheese:
I'm sure you all have seen the small monoliths that have a mini USB input, internal battery, power inverter and USB power port. Any advice on which are the best ones?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.