SSDs - State of the Product?

time

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
4,932
Location
Brisbane, Oz
As long as the drive has LOTS of free space and hasn't received too many writes, you should be able to get within 10-20% of other people's scores - bearing in mind that the SATA controller and driver has a significant impact.

AS SSD does confirm partition alignment and I think the version of the drive firmware (or is that Crystal?). If you run it 10 times, results will get progressively slower. To compare with what other people post, you need to use early results.
 

Bozo

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Feb 12, 2002
Messages
4,396
Location
Twilight Zone
I thought I read on the Crucial forums that writing all 'ones' to an SSD effectively returned it to factory status. Bogus??
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,691
Location
USA
I thought I read on the Crucial forums that writing all 'ones' to an SSD effectively returned it to factory status. Bogus??

Actaully there are some quicker wipes that do just that. I'm sure there are some links a few or many pages back...
 

Stereodude

Not really a
Joined
Jan 22, 2002
Messages
10,865
Location
Michigan
I thought I read on the Crucial forums that writing all 'ones' to an SSD effectively returned it to factory status. Bogus??
Blank flash is all 1's that's true. Writing 1's the entire drive will not return it to factory status. You have to secure erase the thing / trigger the drives internal restoration mechanism.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,691
Location
USA
What happened to the intel 720? I'm waiting for that one. No OCZ, never again.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,533
Location
Horsens, Denmark
One of the downsides of wanting more reliability is having to wait longer for the QA.

I haven't gotten an answer on ESXi and the RevoDrives, so I'm going with some Intel 510 250GBs instead. This way each VM will get it's own.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,691
Location
USA
So you don't have to qualify the hardware with the current system? Are there no change controls required for the system, for example do you repeat IQ/OQ?
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,533
Location
Horsens, Denmark
The only thing I was worried about was the RAID controller on the Revo Drives not being detected properly by ESXi. An SATA drive, provided it doesn't fail, requires no verification to make it work.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,533
Location
Horsens, Denmark
Well, I bought 3 of the 250GB 510s. They'll be in a new ESXi server by the end of next week and in production. I love having a resilient enough failover system to be able to do this kind of thing; it would be so expensive to run HCLed servers with tried-and-true hardware. Even then you might get bit in the butt and still be screwed.
 

Mercutio

Fatwah on Western Digital
Joined
Jan 17, 2002
Messages
21,607
Location
I am omnipresent
My G1 X25-M is definitely near the end of its life. I cloned it and pulled it
On top of that, one of my customers, the same one who had his 160GB X25-M die before, had his drive die again.

I don't know what he's doing that kills them but at this point I suspect it's his fault rather than coincidence.

My massively redundant array of punched card readers can't possibly come soon enough.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,691
Location
USA
My X25-E just keeps on going. Only 22TB written to the 32GB drive IIRC.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,691
Location
USA
One of the downsides of wanting more reliability is having to wait longer for the QA.

I want reliability and durability. Of course there is no way to know for sure how well any of those will hold up. I cannot find the prices on the Intel 720 and am concerned that it may be expensive.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
I want reliability and durability. Of course there is no way to know for sure how well any of those will hold up. I cannot find the prices on the Intel 720 and am concerned that it may be expensive.

http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/23659-prices-for-intels-ssds-leaked

"The prices for Chipzilla's latest line of solid-state drives the SSD 710 series, which are replacing the X25-E SSD series have been leaked.

The new SSDs, which should be around in a couple of weeks, slash the cost-per-gigabyte by 40-odd percent over the X25-E. The 100GB version will cost around $650, the 200GB model will cost roughly $1,250, and the 300GB flavor will be priced at approximately $1,900. It looks like Intel is targetting them towards the enterprise users, rather than the consumer market."
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,533
Location
Horsens, Denmark
That price is low enough to get me interested. I still haven't had any issues with the RevoDrives, but I wouldn't mind keeping my machines all Intel.
 

Pradeep

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 21, 2002
Messages
3,845
Location
Runny glass
That price is low enough to get me interested. I still haven't had any issues with the RevoDrives, but I wouldn't mind keeping my machines all Intel.

The significant write potential of these drives is nice for server use, though the SATA 3.0 interface clearly limits the top end performance for sequential work.

http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...endurance-results-ssd-rants-by-artur-bergman/

If the 100GB SATA model is around $650, that gives hope for the PCI Express based 720 model with 200GB going for around $1300? At 2.2 GB per sec its in another performance league.

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/news/storage-news/details-about-intels-710-and-720-ssd-series-emerge/

Oops, only the 720 has the enhanced write capability, courtesy of the SLC. $1300 is probably wishful thinking.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,533
Location
Horsens, Denmark
We'll see how the price/performance works out. Intel needs to decide whether they are going to compete with OCZ or price higher and pretend they don't exist. I feel that Intel can make a lot of money either way (many won't put OCZ products in enterprise environments), but I would of course prefer to pay less.
 

MaxBurn

Storage Is My Life
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
3,245
Location
SC
I just picked up another 120gb G2 drive to add to my system and replace the 80gb G2. Found that my super old copy of ghost does not align the partitions right for SSD. Fortunately the free copy of arconis that intel let's you download does a good job of alignment when moving to a new disk.
 

MaxBurn

Storage Is My Life
Joined
Jan 20, 2004
Messages
3,245
Location
SC
There a list on what was fixed somewhere? Anything relevant to the G2 drives?
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,691
Location
USA
Mine has older firmware, though not the original buggy firmware. I see no reason to update it.
 

time

Storage? I am Storage!
Joined
Jan 18, 2002
Messages
4,932
Location
Brisbane, Oz
Awesome update! Results at TheSSDReview confirm about 20% improvement in read performance across the board.

I'd definitely apply this to new drives, but frankly the older ones I've deployed have been fast enough already, and - touch wood - I've yet to see any problems.
 

LunarMist

I can't believe I'm a Fixture
Joined
Feb 1, 2003
Messages
16,691
Location
USA
The computer I have to deal with does not have the ACHI. The firmware update may or may not work, but it is not work the risk anyway.
 

ddrueding

Fixture
Joined
Feb 4, 2002
Messages
19,533
Location
Horsens, Denmark
I wonder what would happen if you swapped out the drive for one of your own?

[joke]If I put an SATA SSD on this thing, it would rock![/joke]
 
Top