New Project:
Domain "bobiscool.local" has a bunch of users with large exchange mailboxes. I need to move all the users and their data to "bic.local". Both DCs and Exchange servers are running side-by-side with different IPs and DNS trees.
I've done The JoJo's 3rd option above in the past due...
I've been using the new SmoothWall 3. You might want to take another look at it, lots of features added and a very comprehensive collection of add-ons with web interfaces.
Thanks. I did all this hiking and driving, so many beautiful views. This shot (my favorite) was taken while waiting in line for the bathroom of a gas station. :shrug:
I know it uses more power when it is on (I saw that show, too). The argument I read was that it "killed" the bulb faster to turn it off/on more than just leave it on.
Grrr. Looking at some of the others, there is a lot of dirt on the lens. Strangely, it is only on a certain location/lens combo, and not on ones taken afterwards with the same lens.
Based on my few-dozen experiences with Amtrak, I would rule out that possibility right now. The fact that it can be an hour late and still be a net-positive makes it a good choice though.
I use the one built-in to my laptop, but a friend uses a TomTom and is very happy with it. I have a Garmin model (Rhino-something) for my boat and it works well.
What are you going to use it for? Driving? Hiking? Sailing?
Also, from what I've heard, power cycling is way more of a factor than power-on hours. Some analysis stated that if you were going to turn the light on again within an hour, you should just leave it on (from a bulb-life standpoint, not energy consumption).
I'm off on an extended weekend.
Half-Moon Bay, hwy 1 to Santa Cruz, Salinas to visit the folks, hwy 1 to Morro Bay, visiting my last grandparent, Santa Barbara, and back. About 700 miles. I may be posting on and off...we'll see.
I hear you, Tannin. I've spent a fair amount of time on your site looking at the shots and the lenses used; there is no way I'm going to buy and carry all that gear. And I understand what you mean about getting into place, I attempted just that on some deer the other day. Hell, even getting a...
On Sept. 11, I went to work. In SF within eyesight of Pier 39. I actually got in an argument with security who were trying to make me leave "for my own safety". Stupid cattle.
Mine might have that problem, but it lives it's life plugged in. My ASUS UMPC might have that problem, as the last time I tried to turn it on, it was dead. But it had been sitting in my bag for over a week.
Hardcore birding, Tannin style, is something too involved for me. Based on the weight issue (good point, BTW), I'll be sticking with the 70-300/4-5.6 IS. I'd be interested to know about how far that lens is good for birds and the like.
When shooting outdoors, I think "all I can get" the correct answer to how much reach I want. When I was out hiking with the 18-55, I saw objects/birds/whatever at all distances. 95% of them were out of reach. If I was walking around with a 70-300, 50% of them might still be out of reach. But...
So I've come to the conclusion that I want more than 200mm of reach. I would LOVE the 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS, but $1500 is quite a bit. That leaves me with the 300mm lenses, either one of the 4 70-300 or 2 75-300 or 100-300. And I think IS at these lengths is a must, so that leaves two of the...
Hardly, uda. I used the cruise control at 10+ for the entire drive home last night (11PM). And my 45-50 minute commute took nearly 90 minutes. Madness.
Trying to figure a way to quantify this for myself as well. Here is what I came up with. Calculations are at full-frame, because my math skills suck.
200/300/600mm lens = 12/8.2/4.1 degree diagonal angle of view
At 50 yards, the field of view is 10/7.1/3.6 yards diagonal.
An object 6' tall...
Trying to figure a way to quantify this for myself as well. Here is what I came up with. Calculations are at full-frame, because my math skills suck.
200/300mm lens = 12/8.2 degree diagonal angle of view
At 50 yards, the field of view is 10/7.1 yards diagonal.
An object 6' tall fills the...
My Gateway is sitting right here and Hibernate works very well. The one trick is that you can't choose "Hibernate" and then close the lid immediately. But it wakes up fine 95% of the time (occasionally loses resolution settings).
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.