perhaps some of you have already seen this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH0aEp1oDOI
- boulabiar This exists in Gimp since 2 years ago !!
watch?v=0AoobQQBeVc
Gimp plugin : Resynthesizer
Author : Paul Harrison 13 hours ago
Guess what you're going to be doing?If it is half as good as that, it is worth buying another copy of Photoshop.
Guess what you're going to be doing?
I use a commandline app, youtube-dl ... it should work in Windows.I know Youtube changed their interface. How does one download videos now?
Personally, I would have laughed my ass off if you had continued with "and selling copies in Chinatown for a buck a pop" or something to that effectPirating it ...
Since you're going to pay full price eventually, I won't bother offering it to you at a discount. Thanks for helping pay the bills next quarter, tho'.Pirating it, making sure it half as good as that, then buying a copy with the proceeds from my first sale using the program?
Adobe's site says it's $199.
Personally, I would have laughed my ass off if you had continued with "and selling copies in Chinatown for a buck a pop" or something to that effect![]()
In this case I mean it quite literally. If my composition is poor, or the location dirty, there may be a piece of garbage or trash in the frame. It is often the case on the beach or in parks or stadiums, that trash will be in the picture. If cleaning up the image was as simple as this makes it appear to be, then my images would be better for it.
Ah so. PS CS5 appears to contain a type of auto-retouching tool. It can hardly improve composition per se. Yet it would be fabulous if there were an option to remove those pesky humans from an image.![]()
Adobe's content aware just isn't good enough. This should be safe for work, but if you're at all worried, don't click the link.
It turns out Adobe has yet to endow Photoshop with artificial intelligence.I'm missing the joke.
I'm missing the joke.
In CS6 I demand improvements in the content aware software that allows it to accurately create porn where there wasn't any.
Just imagine some of the awesome by-products; run it frame-by-frame on your favorite movie and get....your favorite movie with naked people!
Since you're going to pay full price eventually, I won't bother offering it to you at a discount. Thanks for helping pay the bills next quarter, tho'.
How could it do that? There could have to be library of potential images, but they would not representative of the realities.