Search results

I can relieve you of that pain any time.

Wait, you want improvements in phone technology to result in a better phone? You must be crazy...;)

Middle-clicking links to open them in new tabs and middle clicking tabs to close them is my default usage, but I can't stand having an additional x on each tab. In addition to taking up space, it is too easy to hit the x when switching tabs.

Yup. The genetics wasn't that great to start with (Grandma had dentures at 30, mom at 50, dad at 55). Combine that with a dozen sodas a day for a decade, and I currently have about 27 cavities in the remaining ~26 teeth that haven't already been root-canaled or otherwise shelled.

For $2k, not bad at all. A virtualization powerhouse.

I'll agree with time that having the x on each tab is a good default selection, as it makes the tab learning curve a little bit easier, but not being able to switch to the fore efficient single-x mode is really poor form.

I read that, but weather balloons are just a little too boring. And you still need FAA permission.

The only change I always make in about:config is to put a single "close tab" x in the top-right. It's right there, and it works. C'mon in, the water is fine.

Excellent.

I bet that they would be happy to take your money for that...

Bah, already fixed. Wouldn't have been much of an upgrade, but whatever.

I know! They sent me the e-mail as well.....so tempting.... What lens will you be trying first? I was thinking about how cool it would be with the 180mm macro...

Please do.

That is cool.

His 7D. That sucks.

Bodies - 25% Lenses - 60% Support Equipment (Tripods, Flashes, Filters) - 10% Photo Trips (money spent going somewhere to take pictures) - 5% Education (Classes, books, whatever) - 0%

I'm curious to hear some photography spending breakdowns of others here. What percentage of your photo spending goes towards the following: Bodies Lenses Support Equipment (Tripods, Flashes, Filters) Photo Trips (money spent going somewhere to take pictures) Education (Classes, books, whatever)

No more bans! The only ban we need is to ban idiots from driving (which the AARP lobby will prevent). There are people that can manage distractions while driving, and there are those that can't drive regardless. This is where the line needs to be drawn. The last study I read said that talking...

I am a strong candidate to have all my teeth pulled and implants put in. It is 10x cheaper (including the flight) to have it done in Russia. Once I have the $10k or so to spare, that is the plan.

Now that I'll be living in a residential neighborhood, I wanted to do my part to pollute the wireless spectrum. Linksys is helping out by providing a device that can transmit 802.11n in both 2.4 and 5Ghz simultaneously!

Even without the gun, situational awareness would have likely kept you safe on it's own.

I'll second TrueCrypt. So long as you can have the software on the machines you are accessing it from, it is by far the best option.

True, but that would be one hell of a cache for a larger storage system.

Most likely. That board is only $1k.

I'm not particularly concerned. While the armed robberies make the news, the vast majority of these idiots don't even bring the right tools to steal what they came for without damaging it. Further, the odds of whomever was out there being able to hit the Maglite (which was 3 feet from where I...

I've got my 42", 27" and 24" monitors at the office, and everyone knows what they are missing ;) I told them that they, like me, are free to buy what they want and I'll hook it up for them.

Just happened to be at my desk at 10PM, when something on a secondary monitor caught my eye. Live surveillance video of one of our locations, and it looked like a guy jumping the fence. Call the boss, drive over there myself. No sign of a person, but I've blocked in his car. While camping out...

This is Server 2003, so no luck there. Source and Target are different volumes on the same machine.

Not that I can see, but I wouldn't try to complicate my life like that, anyway. Is your Firefox instance consuming 4GB of RAM?

This only went about 25GB in before it threw an "insufficient memory" error. This machine has 8GB of RAM, and the target has 8TB free. Thoughts?

A 2 minute phone call. No identifying information beyond the activation code. I do it a dozen times a week.

Reactivating is easy. Don't forget to rename one of them if they will be on the same network.

That looks perfect, Stereodude. Is that a software-only upgrade compatible with the RS, or do I need a proper Smart-UPS?

CloneZilla has worked for me, but day to day I use Acronis TrueImage.

What I really want is a logging capability with graphs for voltage over time and flagged events. Not sure where I need to go to get such things.

Merc, any speculation on where the break-even point is for storage? Of course, the loss of on-line capabilities is tough to quantify, but at what point does buying tapes instead of drives pay for the library system?

Full strength Coke or Dr Pepper. Trying hard to keep it at one can a day.

So far I haven't been faced with the issue. Storage technology is growing faster than our data needs. In other words, we keep everything. All-in, a single full backup of everything is about 2TB. The offline/offsite backup is still a single 3.5" HDD.

No comment ;) I (and those I've talked about it with) drink sodas for the chemical effects. You have essentially removed the good ones (caffeine and sugar) and replaced it with a mild laxative (Splenda) yet you still have to pay for it.

By 2015, all storage in this office will be SSD. Possibly by 2013. I don't believe SSDs have enough time and volume in the market to know acutal figures, but an order of magnitude above HDDs would not surprise me. Further, the much higher IOPS will allow array rebuilds at much larger capacities...

Caffeine Free Diet Coke is for people who like condoms but hate sex.

I didn't bother with a Smart-UPS for the house, this does more than I need.

The thing you need to keep in mind is that nothing is absolute. It is in the layers of different kinds of solutions that provides true redundancy. If I had two identical arrays of identical drives, a miscalculation on reliability would have far worse consequences.

I haven't experienced that issue, but I was seeing transfer rates in the 50-60MB/s range off the single 2TB WD Green drives. If that were closer to 100MB/s I would feel much better streaming multiple BR movies off it.

Wow. Where did you find a machine?

At the moment all my RAID-5 arrays are 1.5TB Samsungs, so 6TB. I was always under the impression that the risk of outright losing a second drive before the array recovers was the biggest fault in RAID-5.

Yup. It is actually 4 drives in the 512GB and 1TB models. IIRC, the 256GB model is only two drives.

One of my complaints about WHS is that there are no performance enhancing RAID levels available. Your options are essentially RAID-1 or single drive. My new plan involves creating two-drive stripes, then adding those as 4TB "drives" into WHS. I'm doubling the chances of failure, but as I specify...

Nearly. You need to factor in the odds of the backup systems failing as well. I ended up with a system where the farther you are from production, the less reliable you are. Production: RAID-10 Backup: low disk count RAID-5 Secondary backup: high disk count RAID-5

If they are removable and SATA, then they are just a compact backplane? If they aren't SATA, then they are expensive and proprietary? If you want it more compact, than making it non-modular would be better.