Search results

liamc seems to believe his evidence was sufficient to prove this, but i remain in the middle about the whole thing (how much faster is it? how much will it impact upgrading? how much more expensive is it? i have no idea). so can any of you observers out there who knew nothing of the...

it appears that it disables all of it, all of the time, in preview mode. i prefer tbird's junk-detection method.

i don't think you're giving consideration to the fact that i'm actually trying to see your (or any) point here. the links you provided aren't saying to me, 'using an on-die memory controller is the best way to go.' they aren't saying 'using an on-board memory controller is the best way to go.'...

i see it as an appeal from you to anybody who disagreed with me on one of the dell threads to, by default, disagree with me here. the entire 'point' there is bullshit anyway, regardless of intent. if you think i was arguing something somewhere without fact, bring up the specific point up in...

complete with lame-o <> tags, wow. proof of what, or evidence of what? i am not seeking to prove anything, i am requesting information. so much for your reading comprehension. the fallacy links were an attack on your 'argument' style (which is a joke in itself, because i'm not arguing...

yeah yeah :) 2/3 i was flatly delinquent, just took too long to ship them. the other one wasn't valid.

you'll never know!

'at work'? i thought you just did on-the-side stuff

http://www.extremetech.com/print_article/0,3998,a=31573,00.asp - single-pager

http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,555398,00.asp

we can leave that one at a big fat 'it depends' i love nextel :)

and i have to admit i felt good about it when i read this: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/technet/security/bulletin/ms03-023.asp

i'm fine with them as long as they clear before i ship

20030701 i wish the folders weren't so mozilla/boring looking, i wish i could delete collapsed threads (when viewing by thread) with a single delete stroke. that's about it for now.

there is no official site because the project died (and was then released as freeware). people are still developing upon it afaik, you just have to find the new location (use deja.com)

wtf is wrong with a computer on a cord? :)

first and foremost, mention that you use scsi drives on all your auctions- they'll know that you get high sustained transfer rates, and thus a very cool cookie. http://pages.ebay.com/turbo_lister/download.html - their own tools can be used to list items and calculate fees i think proper...

oh, also, play around with the channels on the phone and/or router if it's troubling you too.

(continuing from private messages - he does have a 2.4ghz phone) when you're near your access point and talking on the phone you may here a 'tick tick tick', and when the phone is actually being used you'll notice worse range/speed on the wireless lan. it still occurs even when the phone isn't...

one of the more interesting features is that it can 'sanitize' mail it determines to be junk - it disables all the html in it so that you're not 'phoning home' to let them know you got the mail (many spammers now put your unique id in the images you pull down, and are able to verify if you read...

you could look up gravity as well (freeware) and seriously, check out thunderbird

sounds very cool. this seems like a perfect storage application for www.soekris.com -style routers. as it stands, if you're running an os like openbsd on flash you have to mount read-only, log to a remote syslog or a ramdisk, etc, just to avoid write cycles.

if you want to resurrect any thread where i was debating something, feel free. until then, you're unqualified to make these kinds of sweeping statements. http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/bandwagon.html...

no, you haven't. please see the bold text you quoted yourself above. colossal arrogance is claiming 'hiv does not cause aids' without signifigant evidence. what you're failing to get through your thick, belligerent skull is that i am not making a case for on-board memory controllers, nor am i...

outlook express has better imap support too - it's a bit of a mess. i switched to mozilla thunderbird because of oe's imap inadequacies and i've been very pleasantly surprised.

before anybody comes down on me, you know what i mean by 'never' - i mean it in security time :)

i guess i won this round!

most home networks never change their wep key. a single iso image download should do the trick. if he uses wpa this is never a concern...

there was no backpedal :( i only mentioned intel because they're huge, smart, and not doing it. for whatever reason, but i don't believe the fact that they aren't makes them stupid. i think the whole 'any argument is stupid' bit from liamc is presumptuous (to say the least) and a bad argument...

numbers from any other cpu that uses on-die vs the same (or similar) class of cpu using on-board, it doesn't have to be an athlon

well i'm doing a 30% overclock :)

wireless phones can be 900mhz, 2.4ghz, etc - the type matters in this case. iirc, 802.11b uses channels 4 and 6 of the 2.4ghz spectrum and a microwave oven uses channel 5. nice thing to sit on your crotch all day, eh? :) most public hotspots use b.

i didn't change the subject, but i'll accept the compliment uh...The reason is that the reduced memory access latencies more than make up for the additional die cost....you did. in one sentence. i never brought it up directly, so i guess a 'nice change of subject' is in order for you as well...

http://www.linksys.com/press/press.asp?prid=127&cyear=2003 and that's the combo i'd recommend. not much of a price premium over b for the extra speed, and most importantly it supports wpa now. wep is a nuisance for crackers, not security from them. once you get your laptop, walk around...

modchips cost money, can screw up during installation, void your warranty, and can be detected by microsoft when you play online. coupled with the fact that there is a chipless exploit of the font renderer that allows people to boot linux / play pirated discs / whatever i think it's a bad idea...

forgot ps1 compatibility on 'pro's for the ps2, but this means less and less as time goes on. it's also worth mentioning that you need a ps1 memory card to save the games (lame!).

ps2 pros: vast library of games, good controllers, good dvd playback ps2 cons: least powerful, online games are left to the game developers to serve/manage. xbox pros: most powerful, average dvd playback, hdtv high-res output, most ambitious/intelligent online strategy xbox cons: worst...

have you seen this anywhere liamc? if not, from where is your opinion coming?

hm, what revision is the k7s5a? i may be interested

boy, you guys are really high-roading it here. i'll offer my congratulations for your superior intellect and wiser choices! :roll:

slk-900u + panaflo high-output 92mm + arctic silver 3 here

well, with due respect i do believe intel knows what they are talking about. memory is evolving very rapidly. pc2100 to pc2700, pc2700 to pc3200, pc3200 to dual-channel pc3200, and beyond. cpu fsbs scaled to use the bandwidth. these are our upgrades. i'd have to see a side-by-side of costs...

maybe no one likes nintendo, but some love them :) the only games i really buy are first-party nintendo titles and game boy games. my girlfriend is playing wind waker right now while my roommate is watching, and she's been obsessed with it for days (before that ocarina of time, before that...

i think the on-die memory controller is one of the most criticized aspects of the cpu. the only thing i'm worried about are the chipsets. sis to the rescue?

i'd like to congratulate everyone on successfully completing a double thread hijack

a majority of the $190 2.4ghz/800fsb p4s will run at 3.2ghz (higher memory clock to boot). i'm running my 'bad' chip at 3.1ghz/ddr416 2-3-3-5 right now. furthermore, those aren't the chips that are set to go head-to-head with the athlon64

well, i guess at this point people might not notice as much if they paid $400 for windows because systems are so cheap. but if they started charging $150 more across the board for everything, i'm sure the world would throw a gigantic fit. they're not throwing such fits right now.

economics 101, you can't charge what people won't bear. people have been buying ms software, in droves, at present prices for a long time now.

nope

http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=slipstream+service+pack looking? :P