Did I get burn't on the weekend (Samsung)

LiamC

LiamC

0
Joined
Feb 7, 2002
Messages
2,016
Location
Canberra
A friend decided they wanted a new computer during the week. So, specced it out and grabbed the bits. Was very explicit about getting a Samsung HDD (among others)—120GB PATA 8MB, because I couldn't find a SATA.

Anyway, could not get this sucker to install XP. It would do the intial install and then refuse to boot from HDD. As the motherboard (Gigabyte K8NF-9, nForce 4) was a new quantity to me, I went searching and found a few people having similar issues with this board.

To cut a long story short, the drive passes all it's diagnostics, is recognised by the BIOS, can be formatted etc. The kicker is, the drives sequential transfer rate is 3MB/s. That's right, 3!

How do I know I haven't goofed? I don't. What I've tried is:

Maxtor SATA gives 58MB/s on same system
WD 800JB PATA gives 55MB/s on same sytem

Maxtor and WD return proper transfer rates on SiS 648 based sytem. Samsung gives 3.2MB/s. All checks as per HDTach

When I tried to Ghost an image from the Maxtor, the 1.2GB image was going to take 7.5 hours, it was giving a transfer rate of 2MB/s

Have I missed anything? Now to find out Samsung's Aussie RMA procedure.

The first question I got from friend was--"why did you want a Samsung drive?"
 
Have you tried changing the DMA mode to something else on the samsung? This does seem bizzarre.
 
No. I did read somewhere in my travels that there do seem to be some issues with ATA-6 (?? UDMA-133) and some revisions of NVIDIA chipsets

I'll give that a try.

Thanks Doug.
 
What Tannin said.

nForce 4 ATA is very, very common, so incompatibility is unlikely. However, it is worth checking that the drive's transfer settings are as they are supposed to be (I've seen a new Samsung drive where this was not the case).

Samsung has finally extracted the digit and updated their drive tool (HUTIL) to something usable. It's well worth downloading.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top