July 22nd Intel price drops

[P5-133XL]

Because of the planned Intel price cuts for the Q6600's (http://dailytech.com/Intel+Readies+Price+Cuts+For+Quadcore+Desktop+Serv er+Processors/article7293.htm) I am seriously considering replacing my three Dell 3200 P4 machines with new Q6600's with builds very similar to CougTek's build without the x1950's.


Based on this, my recommendation would be the following :
[list]
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (4x 2.4GHz) LGA775
Thermalright Ultra 120 eXtreme heatsink (http://www.anandtech.com/casecooling/showdoc.aspx?i=2981)
Scythe S-FLEX SSF21E (mod to 7V) or similar (http://www.silentpcreview.com/article734-page8.html)
Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 (solid capacitors, lacks Firewire, if it's important to you)
2GB DDR2 667MHZ, or 1066MHz if you plan to overclock. 667MHz is almost half the price.
Sapphire Radeon X1950 Pro 512MB PCI-E (X1950XT doesn't increase FAH production, I know : I own both)
500GB hard drive, because it's cheap. 250GB if you want to cut corners.
Pioneer SATA 18X DVD burner


There's absolutely nothing wrong with the Dell machines. They do their necessary function. The cost to folding performance ratio's are just too great for me to ignore: They will be cheaper to operate and produce aprox. 14x more (around 3,200PPD each vs 220PPD) I may wait till AMD comes out with their quad processor, just to see how that performs before choosing.

I find it ironic that Coug asks about the freefall in RAM prices when what I've noticed is the continued freefall in CPU prices. I rather expected the DDR2 RAM prices to drop when AMD went DDR2 because of the ecconomies of scale that occur when world wide RAM production was no longer split between DDR and DDR2. It took a while, but I'm sure that is the real cause for the RAM price fall. But I'm somewhat surprised that Intel is still dropping CPU prices, rather than trying to take a bit of profit to keep short-term investors happy. Offhand, I feel Intel wants to outright bankrupt AMD first: In the long run very bad for the consumer but very good for Intel ...

[CougTek]

What will you use instead of the X1950 Pro? A cheapo GeFarce 7200GS or X1050?

Even with the recent price drop regarding processors, I'm still able to make money out of it. What sells is and has been for a while CPUs between 100$ and 200$. That still exists, they are only faster. RAM price is too low now for me to make money. More expensive memory modules don't bring enough speed improvement to the average user to justify the significant cost increase, so I can't sell those.

Quad-core AMD processors will be both too expensive and arrive too late to save AMD from a disastrous year.

[CougTek]

Oh and opt for a motherboard with the new P35 chipset from Intel. The memory controller is quite a bit better than the one on the 965P. Now, the supply of P35-based motherboards is scarse, but it won't be at the end of July.

Get one with the DDR2 slots. Fast DDR2 modules give better performances at lower prices than the early DDR3 memory modules.

[P5-133XL]

Yes, I will get a low-end video card or maybe reuse the x1300's that are in my Dells: I just see no reason to signifigently increase my operating electricity costs by using a x1950. Yes, I do recognize that the p35 chipset is very good, performance wise: I read all the Antech articles too. I'll make that decision at build time, just like the DDR2/DDR3 decision because that may change by July too.

My current thinking is that I'll just sell/donate the Dells. The other alternative is to turn them into dedicated GPU folding machines, but that is harder to rationalize.

[Fushigi]

You know, I was pretty much set to pull the trigger and buy everything. But if I can save over $250 or get a faster CPU for the same price by waiting 2 months I'd be silly not to.

[CougTek]

I'll delay my new system until the Q6600 price drop too. So there will be at least one Q6600 from me, one for Fushigi and... depending on how much P5-133XL is whiling to withdraw from his RRSP... a whole lot more for P5-133XL. Let's say three (although I'm sure he won't limit himself to a small trio) ; that'll make an additional 5x 3200ppd to our collective effort. We're talking about more than 16K ppd. Not bad.

Who wants to bet LiamC won't let himself be distanced and join the crazy money-throwing quad cores folders?

[LiamC]

Who wants to bet LiamC won't let himself be distanced and join the crazy money-throwing quad cores folders?

Busted :D

I just sold my remaining E4300 and I am going to replace it with an E6420. Then I looked at the Q6600 (AUS$660) and thought "hmm, that's not bad." Then I remembered the price drop and thought that'd be foolish. That triggered the urge to drop be SF—and see what new posts there were ;)

Yep, come July, I'll replace the E6420 with one.

Then again, we should know what Barcelona has in store by then...

[CougTek]

The Core 2 Quad Q6600 drop 100$ on my price lists today. Still not the July 22nd price, but one third of the road is done.

[P5-133XL]

They really shoot themselves in the foot when signifigent price decreases are announanced months in advance: People hold off on their purchases and all buy them when its cheap. If they didn't announance, then some of them would buy at the higher price ...

[Bozo]

I have a brand new Gigabyte motherboard sitting here waiting for a CPU. Don't know if I can hold off until late July...:crap:

Bozo :joker:

[ddrueding]

They really shoot themselves in the foot when signifigent price decreases are announanced months in advance: People hold off on their purchases and all buy them when its cheap. If they didn't announance, then some of them would buy at the higher price ...


I have a brand new Gigabyte motherboard sitting here waiting for a CPU. Don't know if I can hold off until late July...:crap:

Bozo :joker:

No doubt the reason for the $100 off starting now. I wouldn't be surprised if they did the rest of the declared cut as a series of drops to entice the impatient.

[LiamC]

They really shoot themselves in the foot when signifigent price decreases are announanced months in advance: People hold off on their purchases and all buy them when its cheap. If they didn't announance, then some of them would buy at the higher price ...

I tend to disagree. To enthusiasts, this is "common" knowledge. To the vast majority of purchasers, they wouldn't know about them.

[CougTek]

...announanced....
Is this only a comic way to say "announced" or is it another english word I've never encountered before? This is the second time I noticed you use this word.

[Will Rickards]

I've already got my wishlist saved at newegg and ready to purchase when the prices come down.

How do RAM prices look coug? staying flat or going up?

[P5-133XL]

Is this only a comic way to say "announced" or is it another english word I've never encountered before? This is the second time I noticed you use this word.

No, just my consistant mis-spelling ...

[CougTek]

RAM went up slightly. 2$ more for a gigabyte of DDR2 667MHz. Higher speed grades became a lot cheaper last month, but now the progression is flat. Regular DDR dropped during the last two weeks by ~10%.

[Wavemaker]

As far as Core2 Duo and Core2 Quadro processors go, I think I'd wait until the ones based on 45nm manufacturing technology start shipping. This is *especially* true for mobile applications.

The upcoming processors based on 45nm technology will be faster yet, less expensive, and use much less power.

The greatest benefit with the upcoming processors based on 45nm technology -- compared with today's Core2 processors based on 65nm technology -- will be less power consumed (i.e. -- less heat).

[Wavemaker]

PS: Since we are speaking of "modern" X86 systems, I'm really disappointed so far with the offerings of mobo and system manufacturers with respects to utilising EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface).

To my knowledge, only Apple and Gateway have taken advantage of the great potential that EFI offers. Gateway has occasionally produced systems using EFI and Apple had no choice but to use EFI when they ported the Mac ROM code to the Intel platform. Outside of these two, it's basically been zilch, zed, zero -- at least to my knowledge -- for implementing EFI in a meaningful way.

Besides replacing the increasingly-ancient BIOS, EFI can have built-in "life saving" utilities, such as the ability to perform a variety of offline (or even online) diagnostics, aid in the installation of an operating system, have a user-defined bit of space for settings, logs, and more. For example, a mobo manufacturer could install a Phoenix, AMI, or Award *EFI* that would be tailor fit to the mobo, or a mobo series. In the EFI could be a Knoppix (or BSD) build that could run several diagnostics without having to boot to an operating system. You could also run vital operations such as disc imaging routines for migrating an operating system on a failing hard drive to a new drive.

The EFI experience seems to be a lot like the recent PATA-to-SATA transition for CD/DVD drives. It seems that none of the manufacturers want to mess with EFI unless the proverbial gun is pointed in their direction (by Intel? Microsoft?), thus making them transition.

[udaman]

As far as Core2 Duo and Core2 Quadro processors go, I think I'd wait until the ones based on 45nm manufacturing technology start shipping. This is *especially* true for mobile applications.

The upcoming processors based on 45nm technology will be faster yet, less expensive, and use much less power.

The greatest benefit with the upcoming processors based on 45nm technology -- compared with today's Core2 processors based on 65nm technology -- will be less power consumed (i.e. -- less heat).




It also remains to be seen how agressive Intel will be in their upping the stakes with more powerful integrated GPU's rumored to be in the works, as competition for Nvidia &AMD/ATI. Lets not also forget with Penryn (45nm process mobile) the Monteviña chipset is rumored to support more energy efficient DDR3 800Mhz RAM, as well as a possible 1033Mhz FSB, IIRC. Still won't be up to desktop performance, but a nice bump in performance over current C2D laptops. Without question though, the greatest performance bump on the laptop front with be later in 2008 with the inclusion of the optional SSD's for those highend users who don't need max. capacity but want greater than HDD 15k rpm performance.

Damn WM, the guy knows his shit :diablo: almost make SF, not so boring :-)

[Fushigi]

Sorry; I don't follow CPU roadmaps anymore. With the 45nm chips, what's the expected time frame and will they be Socket 775?

[CougTek]

E.O.T.Y.

[LiamC]

My understanding is that parts are ready to roll. They will be available when Barcelona ships. The obvious differentiators are 6MB cache vs 4MB and faster busses.

[Fushigi]

Well then I won't wait to upgrade another box in my folding farm.

[LiamC]

For quad cores, I think the larger L2 will be a huge boost.

On another note, The Inq is saying that Barcelona will ship mid/end of August

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=40465

That would be the server version. Every roadmap I've seen has stated desktop availability 3 months later.

[LiamC]

Hmm. Those July 22 price cuts seem judiciously well timed...

[Wavemaker]

Sorry; I don't follow CPU roadmaps anymore. With the 45nm chips, what's the expected time frame and will they be Socket 775?

Core2 microprocessors based on 45nm manufacturing technology are to begin arriving 4Q/2007. They will use LGA775 -- same as what's used now. Code words for these "Penryn" technology microprocessors for the desktop are: "Wolfdale" (dual-core) and "Yorkfield" (quad-core).

Otherwise, it pays to follow those increasingly obfuscated roadmaps -- for both microprocessors and chipsets.

I was just looking over your original specifications, followed by the various responses and recommendations in the "Building new FAH/main PC" subject.


The Conclusion (my snotty opinion, of course) ;) :zzz:

You actually would have been better off NOT getting any mobo based on the 965 chipset (a.k.a. -- "Broadwater"). Instead, you should have bought a mobo based on the recently-issued P35 chipset (a.k.a. -- "Bearslake"). The P35 chipset is superior to the 965 chipset in every way. Mobos based on the P35 chipset became available starting the last half of May. Pricing is about the same for mobos based on either 965 or P35 chipset. Mobos based on P35 will run all generations of (65nm) Conroe, Kentsfield, and Allendale at their full FSB speeds (all the way up to 1333 MHz), as well as run the first generation of (45nm) Wolfdale and Yorkfield.

Using the popular NewEgg, here's a selection of 16 mobos from Abit, Gigabyte, Asus, MSI, and Biostar using the P35 chipset:

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128050 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813121314

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130095 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813138075

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813127031 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813186119

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128048 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130098

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813127029 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131180

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128048 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128047

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813127030 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131182

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813131181 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128046

[Wavemaker]

My understanding is that parts are ready to roll. They will be available when Barcelona ships. The obvious differentiators are 6MB cache vs 4MB and faster busses.

Are you speaking of Intel's 45nm processors (a.k.a. -- "Penryn")?

Barring a manufacturing problem, I suspect AMD Barcelona will beat Penryn.

In any case, the medium-term future for AMD on the desktop looks to be a bit grim. Once Penryn processors begin churning out in full force, Intel will have a desktop microprocessor for every price range -- absolutely dirt cheap but reasonably peppy little "Celery" processors (probably using just the name "Pentium" ...incredibly :o ) right on up to fierce dual-core and quad-core processors. However, AMD will have a stronghold at the top of the server processor market, since Intel Xeons still don't scale well above 2 sockets compared to AMD Opterons. But, that will probably change once Xeons based on Nahalem processor technology shows up in 2009 -- with CSI "Quick Path" to challenge HyperTransport.

[Wavemaker]

[BUMP]

.

[LiamC]

Are you speaking of Intel's 45nm processors (a.k.a. -- "Penryn")?

Barring a manufacturing problem, I suspect AMD Barcelona will beat Penryn.

In any case, the medium-term future for AMD on the desktop looks to be a bit grim. Once Penryn processors begin churning out in full force, Intel will have a desktop microprocessor for every price range -- absolutely dirt cheap but reasonably peppy little "Celery" processors (probably using just the name "Pentium" ...incredibly :o ) right on up to fierce dual-core and quad-core processors. However, AMD will have a stronghold at the top of the server processor market, since Intel Xeons still don't scale well above 2 sockets compared to AMD Opterons. But, that will probably change once Xeons based on Nahalem processor technology shows up in 2009 -- with CSI "Quick Path" to challenge HyperTransport.




Yep. Penryn, Wolfdale et.al. Actually, Intel quad core chips will have 12MB cache as they are still 2 cores on one die.


Barcelona > Wolfdale? Will depend on workload and the clock speed AMD can deliver. In 4S/8S configs, Barcelona all the way. Barcelona will be doable in 8S as well.

[Fushigi]

Re: Wavemaker's 'conclusion':

I don't have any buyers remorse. I don't tend to upgrade CPUs without also upgrading the motherboard and unless there's a significant performance difference I won't feel bad about using the 965.

But it is good to keep in mind for the next round.

[Pradeep]

Given Intel's past performance with motherboard backward compatibility, I would never consider it a factor when buying an Intel mobo.

[CougTek]

Thanks for taking the time to make the P35 motherboard list, Wavemaker. Out of the 16 boards, the MSI Neo2-FSR packs a lot of features for the price. The Gigabyte boards are expensive. Asus boards too. 135$ seems like the bottom price to get a good board with decent overclocking features.

I noticed Asus and Gigabyte warranties are down to 1 year. They were 3 years not long ago. When did that change?

[Bozo]

This is interesting:

http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/MailHome.asp?datePublish=2007/6/20&pages=PD&seq=222

Hopefully it will drive Core-2-Duo prices to bargan basement prices.

Bozo :joker:

[CougTek]

How do RAM prices look coug? staying flat or going up?
RAM price increased a lot during the last two days. +7$ for 1Go DDR2 667MHz.

[Will Rickards]

Whew, good thing I bought a couple weeks ago. I bought some decently priced 667 without a mail-in rebate. I only bought it then because I heard it was going up and didn't want to get sticker shock around july 22nd when I get the MB/Proc/Case.

[Wavemaker]

This is interesting:

http://www.digitimes.com/NewsShow/MailHome.asp?datePublish=2007/6/20&pages=PD&seq=222

Hopefully it will drive Core-2-Duo prices to bargan basement prices.


Interesting.

So if they intend to ramp up 1333 MHz Core2 (non-Xeon) this early, it looks like there's a decent possibility the upcoming X38 chipset (with Version 2 PCI Express slots!) will support 1600 MHz FSB along with an upper-crusty line of 45nm Core2 (non-Xeon) processors supporting 1600 Mhz FSB.

In other words, "Wolfdale" (the desktop 45nm Core2) could start off being available in three FSB tiers: 1600 MHz (deluxe and eXtreme), 1333 MHz (mainstream), and 1066 MHz (economy).

[LunarMist]

All these CPU types are confusing. Does this mean I can reasonably upgrade from 2006 model E6700 to something faster in the same MB?

[ddrueding]

Version 2 PCI Express? Now I know I haven't been reading enough...

[Bozo]

All these CPU types are confusing. Does this mean I can reasonably upgrade from 2006 model E6700 to something faster in the same MB?

I would imagine that would depend on the motherbaord and chipset.

Bozo :joker:

[LunarMist]

It is an Asus and the BIOS indicates 975X and 82801 of some sort. Does that mean anything? I can't remember the exact model anymore and disassembly is a pain.

[Bozo]

I would speculate that the 975X is an Intel chipset. Searching Intels and ASUS sites might give you some info on what CPU is supported.

Bozo :joker:

[Bozo]

It is an Asus and the BIOS indicates 975X and 82801 of some sort. Does that mean anything? I can't remember the exact model anymore and disassembly is a pain.

Here is a start:
http://www.intel.com/products/chipsets/975x/index.htm

No mention of Quad Core.

Bozo :joker:

[LunarMist]

So my 7-month old system is completely obsolete. Great. :(

[CougTek]

It is an Asus and the BIOS indicates 975X...
P5W-DH

[LunarMist]

Yes, that seems to be it, thanks. If no CPU upgrade is possible I will leave it alone until ~2009. I will not suffer the full reinstall process anytime soon. It is too time consuming and painful.

[Splash]

...So if they intend to ramp up 1333 MHz Core2 (non-Xeon) this early, it looks like there's a decent possibility the upcoming X38 chipset will support 1600 MHz FSB along with an upper-crusty line of 45nm Core2 (non-Xeon) processors supporting 1600 Mhz FSB...


Well, it seems 1333 MHz FSB will be around for at least a year, until Nehalem shows up.

The Nehalem processor family will be the first Intel processors to have an on-die memory controller, but, early word now has it that a (budget?) model line of Nehalem processors will also be available *without* an on-die memory controller.





Version 2 PCI Express? Now I know I haven't been reading enough...


The introduction of PCIe V2 has been moved forward significantly. The graphics card duopoly have been the ones screaming the loudest for PCIe V2.

Other than the minor tweaks, the big changes with PCIe V2 will be double-the-bandwidth of each lane and better support for virtual I/O for virtual server / workstation operations. PCIe V2 is fully backward-compatible with all revisions of PCIe.

[Pradeep]

What's impressive is the price of the new quad core Xeons. Even the most expensive model at 3.13 GHz is less than the price of the 5160 dual core @ 3 GHz. I thought 1333 FSB would matter for the quads but it looks like it only delivers a few percentage points of performance.

[ddrueding]

Where are you seeing those prices Pradeep?

[Pradeep]

They aren't out yet:

http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Leaks+45nm+Xeon+Clock+Frequencies/article8065.htm

From what I recall the E5450 was going to be $891 or somesuch.

[Fushigi]

$299.99 @ Newegg (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=19-115-017)

[CougTek]

My cost for the Q6600 dropped 45$CDN today. It should drop by another 20-40$ Monday.

[Bozo]

Today is the July 22. Where are the announcements?

Bozo :joker:

[LiamC]

Most NDAs lifting on a Monday do so ~16:00 Aus EST (GMT +10), which is about 1:40 from this post. I'd expect the announcements then.

[ddrueding]

Newegg is out of stock and still at $299.

[timwhit]

I am interested in this quad core CPU, what kind of performance enhancement will it have over a dual core of similar speed? I think I will wait until it is under $250 though.

[ddrueding]

Depends on what (or how many things) you are doing. Many tasks don't use multiple cores, so you would only be using 1/4 or your CPU. If you have a lot of things going at once, it will really pay off.

[P5-133XL]

Today is the July 22. Where are the announcements?

Bozo :joker:

Intel Price Cuts: Now you see it, Now you don't (http://www.dailytech.com/Intel+Price+Cuts+Now+You+See+it+Now+You+Dont/article8137.htm).

The quick answer: The demand far exceeded the supply, so the price didn't drop as much as expected.

[timwhit]

Depends on what (or how many things) you are doing. Many tasks don't use multiple cores, so you would only be using 1/4 or your CPU. If you have a lot of things going at once, it will really pay off.

That's what I figured. I would probably be fine with a Core 2 Duo, I guess I will just check out the prices when I am ready to buy.

So, when will the best time to buy an Intel CPU? If the price drops didn't affect the market that much maybe it is better to wait?

[Will Rickards]

Yes I checked the prices monday and found them not what I expected or out of stock. I'll check back on friday after the initial surge.

[Bozo]

Price cuts? Price cuts? What price cuts?

Apparently I was thinking the Core 2 Duo for the masses was going to have it's price reduced. Now I don't feel so bad about buying mine last month.

Bozo :joker:

[ddrueding]

Q6600 still @ $375 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017)

Coug? What can you manage on a Q6600?

[CougTek]

Yesterday, I could have sold it for 335$CAN. Today, the best price I'm willing to do for the Q6600 is 365$CAN + shipping. My main CPU supplier told me that everyone sold out yesterday and today the price went up like crazy. It costs me 37$ more to buy one today than it did yesterday, so at 365$, I'm making less money (basicly none) than I could have made yesterday.

I sold one today in a computer system I quoted and I don't know where/when/how I'll get it. Intel should have stocked more to meet the demand. It's not like if it was that hard to foresee.

[ddrueding]

Well, thanks for the inside scoop, Coug. Looks like Intel got what they wanted with their press leak. If you don't mind, put in a word here when the price resumes it's downward slide.

[Stereodude]

It's all about supply and demand... Apparent there was a lot more demand @ $266 than supply.

[CougTek]

The problem is : It's never been selling at 266$. 278$ is the lowest I've witnessed. 290$CAN here.

[ddrueding]

Yep. It seems a lot of people told their friends to buy on July 22nd, and either didn't notice that they price wasn't where they expected, or couldn't wait any longer even though they would pay more.

[ddrueding]

Out of curiosity, did the other Intel chips go down as much as expected, or did they also do a bounce?

[Will Rickards]

I was looking at the core 2 duo *50 processors, and mwave had the lower prices but newegg had higher prices.

[Stereodude]

The problem is : It's never been selling at 266$. 278$ is the lowest I've witnessed. 290$CAN here.Well, $266 was the disty price per chip in 1000 chip lots, so it was never going to get to $266 on this price drop.

[CougTek]

Out of curiosity, did the other Intel chips go down as much as expected, or did they also do a bounce?
I know at least the E6700 (dual core) bounced too. 25$CAN more than Monday. Today the Core 2 Quad Q6600 dropped a little. I can sell it at 349.99$CAN.

[P5-133XL]

Well, $266 was the disty price per chip in 1000 chip lots, so it was never going to get to $266 on this price drop.

Technically true, but historicly inaccurate. Historicly, the stand-alone retail CPU's sell at the 1000 chip lot distributer prices at the standard internet retailers (like newegg) and have for an aweful lot of years. Part of the reason, that particular price gets quoted in the press so much is that people expect to be able to buy them at that price.

[P5-133XL]

test to see if this will post ....

By the way, I got a good deal from my local frys on a Quad 6600 with an ECS motherboard ($279 July 4th sale). So I built it, and have officially replaced my 3 P4's with that one machine. Total cost was around $700 [($279 + $119 (P180) + $79 (2GB OCZ PC2-6400) + $199 (750W PC Power and cooling quad PS)]

[P5-133XL]

By the way, I got a good deal from my local Frys on a Quad 6600 with an ECS motherboard ($279 July 4th sale). So I built it, and have officially replaced my 3 P4's with that one machine. Total cost was around $700 [($279 + $119 (P180) + $79 (2GB OCZ PC2-6400) + $199 (750W PC Power and cooling quad PS)]

Space holder because this paragraph refusing to save ....

The three P4's were getting around 700PPD for a net increase of 1500PPD. I figure that the entire transaction should be paid in full in roughly three years, just by the decrease in electricity cost alone.


The reason, my PPD didn't immediately go up immediately is that it got hot here so I shut down one pod of four machines just to keep my place even close to comfortable. When it gets 80+ outside, it gets really hot inside... This week, it cooled down, so I restarted the pod and my PPD score has been rising.

My next thought is should I replace four X2 4600's (turning them on only when specificly needed) with one more 24x7 Quad 6600. The PPD would be roughtly equal and payback time period will only be two years (an extra machine taken out of service). The two alternatives are simply to wait for the .45 chips to come out or totally scavange one 4600 machine reusing the case and PS thus saving $300 more dollars (yes, I know I can get a cheaper case and PS but I probably can't get a similar deal on the CPU+MB) and thereby dropping the payback time to less than a year. All good stuff

I'm also considering, in the back of my mind, replacing the junk ECS MB with a good motherboad and a Thermalright Ultra-120 extreme heat-sink just to see how much I can OC. The numbers at www.fahinfo.net say I can get 3200PPD by simply OC'ing 2.4GHz to 3.2GHz and that should be doable using the Intel retail heatsink though it probably sound like a jet engine. Using the ThermalRight, Anand-tech is getting 3.9+GHz ...

[P5-133XL]

By the way, the forums seem to be having problems with me posting or editing the above message so part of the second paragraph is missing. I was trying to ID the specific part that it wouldn't take by editing a message and adding pieces till it would fail ....

The specific symptom is for me to post and then it would take forever to actually post it while telling me to wait (till I would give up).

Sorry

[Bozo]

Newegg has been running motherboard/C2D specials lately.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2010340343+50001157+1389627502+1050722265+105092 2263&name=Conroe


Bozo :joker:

[Fushigi]

Microcenter (http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0257938) still shows the Q6600 for $299. If the price doesn't change tomorrow I'll pick one up & use it to replace my slow Folders like Mark did.

[Will Rickards]

Now I'm unsure which to get the E6750 ($209) or the Q6600 ($289).
What do you think?
If just for folding I should pick the Q6600 correct?

Questions on my mind:
Which runs hotter? I'm going to use the stock cooler unless it doesn't fit in my microatx case NSK2400.
Will power requirements be an issue with the 380W power supply in the NSK2400?

[CougTek]

Now I'm unsure which to get the E6750 ($209) or the Q6600 ($289).
What do you think?
If just for folding I should pick the Q6600 correct?
Yes


Which runs hotter?
105W for the Q6600, 65W for the E6750. Answer : Q6600.

I'm going to use the stock cooler unless it doesn't fit in my microatx case NSK2400.
It fits.

Will power requirements be an issue with the 380W power supply in the NSK2400?
No. Unless you do something stupid and try to put a 225W HD2900XT into the system. 380W is well enough for a 105W CPU, reasonable (not insane) graphic card, any µATX motherboard and RAM and four or less drives.

[Will Rickards]

"One" more question before I pick the Q6600.
Let's assume I pick the Q6600 and slap it in a motherboard with support for the 1333 Mhz FSB. Next year when the intel die shrunk native quad core chips are out, will they work in my G33 based motherboard? Or will there be a different socket or chipset? Or will I need DDR3 for that?

[Will Rickards]

I think I confirmed my question about the upcoming 45nm penryn processors is a yes. So I bought the items.
Antec NSK2400
Gigabyte GA-G33M-DS2R
Intel Q6600 (retail so I can use stock cooler)
4GB DDR2 memory
Optiarc AWG170S-B2

[ddrueding]

Looks like a nice little box Will.

[CougTek]

If you don't mind, put in a word here when the price resumes it's downward slide.
Today was the first day since July 23rd on which I could buy a Q6600 for less than 300$CDN from my main supplier. I can't sell it for less than 300$ though (320$CDN).

[Will Rickards]

And mwave just dropped their price from 289 to 282.

[ddrueding]

$280 (http://www.mwave.com/mwave/viewspec.hmx?scriteria=MB-BA23383&RSKU=MB-BA23383)

While Newegg is still $309 (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017)

[Will Rickards]

That is the motherboard bundle one.
list (http://www.mwave.com/mwave/DeepSearch.hmx?scriteria=Q6600&ALL=y&TP=4)

[Stereodude]

Oh gnoes!!! It's $2 more with $20 in free movie downloads!!!

[Fushigi]

My slow Folders have been replaced but I've got another problem. To avoid buying another Windows XP/Vista license or learning enough Linux to use it I used an existing W2K license from one of the decommissioned PCs. It appears W2K (with all updates applied) sees 2 cores and stops. I think the C2Q is basically running like a C2D.

So what options do I have?
- Find some undocumented W2K patch to recognize the C2Q.
- Buy XP OEM/upgrade (Will XP Home see a C2Q?)
- Buy Vista OEM/upgrade (which is the cheapest version I can get by with?)
- Go the Linux route.

The XP/Vista route will run a minimum of $100 or so. More than I'd care to spend but easier than learning enough Linux to use it. I know there are Linux people I can count on here but my time is really at a premium of late.

Ideas? Right now the SMP client is running but it's obvious that only 2 cores are being used as it's taking almost exactly twice as long as my main PC to complete a unit.

[Mercutio]

Windows 2000 Pro flat-out won't see more than two CPUs, real or virtual. XP
You could install TinyXP, XP Home and XP Pro.
The rule on XP is essentially that XP will support whatever fits in one or two physical CPU sockets.

You could install SuSE or Ubuntu. Depending on what your needs for this PC are, that could be a very good choice.

If you're going Vista, there's no reason to buy or use anything more than Home Basic, unless you need to join a domain or the Mobility Center.

[timwhit]

If you wanted to try out Ubuntu, try one of their live CDs or try it in VMWare, that would at least let you know if it will do what you want before you install it for real on your machine.

[Fushigi]

Thinking further, as I plan to eventually plop an X1950 for GPU folding into that machine I'll have to go the Windows route since Stanford doesn't yet have a GPU Folding client.

Vista Home Basic Upgrade is $56 + S/H (http://www.buycheapsoftware.com/details%7EproductID%7E3492.asp); that should do the trick.

[mubs]

The rule on XP is essentially that XP will support whatever fits in one or two physical CPU sockets.

AFAIK, that's true for XP Pro; XP Home sees only one socket/two cores.

[Fushigi]

Mubs, is it one socket or two cores? This (http://download.microsoft.com/download/f/1/e/f1ecd771-cf97-4d98-9a1b-b86e3f24e08f/multicore_hyperthread_brief.doc)(bottom of page 3) just says multi-core.

[Mercutio]

It's based on the number of sockets, not the number of cores.
XP Home Supports ONE. XP Pro supports TWO.

[mubs]

I stand corrected, gentlemen.

[Fushigi]

My second C2Q, the one that replaced the slower Folders, blew the PSU a few days ago. So much for going the budget route. I just dropped an Antec SmartPower 500W (http://shop4.outpost.com/product/4455906?site=sr:SEARCH:MAIN_RSLT_PG) in to replace it. So it's up again. Right now I'm converting the file system to NTFS as Vista requires that. Then I'll put Vista Home Basic on it and resume quad core Folding. I probably won't get it fully online until Saturday.

[P5-133XL]

C2Q at $243 shipped from Geeks.com via Bens Bargins (http://bensbargains.net/merchants/26/Geeks_com_Coupons/). I certainly has taken longer than expected to get that low.